Bennett Rating and Best BuildsComment

>>111 The healing is just a bonus anyway.

Never built him

I decided to do the Ascenscion Domain Today(Twice). I was AR 45 before, now I'm AR 56. Now I have to decide which Characters to prioritize ascending and getting to level 90. My Bennett is Level 80 at the Moment. How Implrtant is it to Ascend him and how Important is it to get him to level 90?

good buffer for some characters & worst healer

My build for him prioritize team BUF > personal DMG > healing. For team buff : Aquila Favonia, Noblesse x4, ER sands and LOTS of ER on all substats (236% total) For personal DMG : pyro goblet, crit circlet (53% CR, 98% CD total), some ATK if possible For healing : some HP if possible (but actually I have only 18k)

>>108 "than" atk buff

>>96 before 3.0 = he's broken unit after 3.0, 4.0 = someone says overrated?? well no, but actually yes first, dendro makes new meta comps that doesn't need bennett. and in 4.0, some characters has hp scaling, that's make bennett unusable (they need dmg bonus more that atk buff)

>>103 if the context are comparing festering desire and sacrificial, ofc sacrificial better still aged well, if u stay on the context

>>105 they were talking about healing not atk, can you even read?

>>104 bennett gives huge amount atk with his base kit while koko needs to use ttds weapon and tenacity artifact to give mid amount of atk 😂

>>102 "as good as kokomi" lololololol. kokomi laughing with her jellyfish

>>4 After 3 years, this Statement hast not aged well at all

>>96 he is not overrated at all. one of his best 4 star weapon is craftable and his artifact set can be easily build, he only need c1 and a little investment then he can provide a healing which is as good as kokomi and 800 atk buff for almost infinite uptime, easily the most broken 4 star

>>99 Agreed. It may be even better than Fleuve Cendre. Sapwood has useless passive for most Bennett teams but with ER% sands and substats he doesn’t need even more ER. Sac is defo not 3rd best for Bennett with its low base attack. Should be replaced with Skyward Blade

>>96 He’s only better in late game.When u obtain the right weapons(smth at least as good as sapwood blade),have enough ER to reliably proc burst, most importantly have enough ER for his teammates(so they can i-frame burst while in Bennett’s field to get easy heals) he can very reliably keep team alive at endgame while he’s the only unit who can both heal + give universal dmg boost.Also, hes much better for dealing with larger enemies compared to a bunch of small ones,so even better for endgame

sapwood blade is WAY better than sacrificial blade, its not even recommended for him anymore

>>97 He still needs er & hp by artifacts. You have to fill that burst before your team die. You have to put all your characters to that circle, wait for healing one by one but max %70. He is great as soon as you have great builds. Yes, he's overrated.

>>96 his burst buff depends on his base attack not artifacts also let them overhype him then, he's a buffer and a healer, which are uncommon, but not rare

He is the most overrated character of the game. There are people call him 6 star character, probably they are accounts who has started the game in early versions and has best artifacts for him (he is their first healer), also who has other best build characters. He is lack of healer, his attack buff is not that significant amount if you don't have great artifacts. He can be easly replaced by other healers dependind on team. Yes, he is good support but he doesn't deserve the fame that he has

>>74 No, he doesn't, read the skill description carefully