>>3 You are right, and we are updating older hero pages as we go. However, it is quite difficult to update over a thousand hero pages at once. Moving forward, we will be adding dates in builds, as you suggested.

>>2 this definitely still shouldn't be an S rating. I know u can't redo every hero every year, but i think y'all should at least put dates in the builds, so we can at least have some context on when the build was good, & whether it just needs minor tweaks/updates, or needs to be completely ignored (like if a build is 3 or 4 yrs old, it's definitely not going to hold up to present meta standards. Players who haven't played since day 1 can't always tell how old a build is just by the skills).

I wish y'all had updated builds for older heroes like this. I know u do for some, especially resplendent heroes, but I'd like to invest in an older unit as a newer player. Without being able to see if i have the best fodder available to complete a good build it's not worth trying just to hope what i plan will work well.