>>64 That's right. Besides, there will be teammates that will cover your ass if you messed up.

>>63 It's not impossible. It's how you respond to anything he throws at you.

>>62 Unless the mastermind is not paying attention to you, it's possible to pull off.

>>61 Whenever I use Jill, I always rush the objectives and it really saves time.

>>60 That's true. If you use it efficiently, it will really feel like it is broken haha.

>>59 It still has a cooldown. It's not that broken. It's how you use it.

>>58 Her evade skill is the main reason for that. It's so broken.

Jill is really a veteran against big monsters. She can challenge those bastards on a 1 on 1 fight.

>>56 Hmmm. Resistance being a competitive game? Why? I can't think of a reason why it should become a competitive game.

>>52 This is what I wanted. I think resistance can become a competitive game if most of the players would want it.

>>54 Yeah you're right. Remember: this is just a game.

>>53 You're too harsh. Anyone has the right to play this game since we all bought it.

>>52 Looking at the positive side, yes. Noobs will eventually quit this game.

>>51 No, if we just keep on playing it. It's actually better this way. Only competitive people will be left in the game. I can now take this game seriously for a bit.

>>50 I thought it will take more months but they lose players in an instant. This is an alarming rate. Time to say goodbye to resistance?

>>49 I agree. Right now more players are quitting the game you know. Only 450+ players played today.

>>48 Yeah. Maybe adding more maps and objectives are the best moves they can do for now.

>>47 Of course. That's what always happens. But I think they won't for now. There are few characters in the game so nerfing one of them would be a bad move. Players will lose interest faster than expected.

>>46 yup. But I'm pretty sure Jill will stay at the top. But if they decided to nerf her, for sure she'll fall off the ranks.

>>45 It depends on what will be the update in the near future.