Desensitized Horror Game Fans

>>43

To borrow another commenter's wise words, I'm having a gamegasm just thinking about it.

GEEZ. The RING meets JUMANJI. Still hits nostalgia, without being a direct remake. We're not even devs and we're coming up with creative sht. Should we become devs and just make it?

>>45

Beyond the Gates is a campy version of what you're describing.

>>46

No, what I'm describing hasn't been created yet, so it's not like anything. It's inspired by The Ring and Jumanji, just so people can wrap their head around the idea.

>>47

But it's not necessarily a "real-life board game that kills you 7 days after you play it" movie. It could be totally new. It COULD be original, if original and creative minds worked on it.

>>48

I guess so, but can anything ever be original? Isn't everything inspired by something else?

>>49

Hm. Maybe we can only innovate at this point. What can be invented anymore?

>>50

I think it's still possible to invent. There's no time machine yet, and time travel IS theoretically possible. So if there's one thing left, there must be endless things left.

>>51

Well, can they invent a game system that we can live in already? I'm tired of this reality.

>>52

ikr. someone posted a PS9 commercial from Sony in 2000. Why are we still waiting for the PS5 and the Xbox Series X?

>>53

Yeah, WHY are they still bulky ass systems? Shouldn't we be dealing with nanotech already?

>>54

Well, technically, there's nanotech INSIDE the bulky systems. That's why they're so powerful, because they're bulky and saturated with nanotech. There are probably thousands of PS1 power in the PS5.

>>55

So you're saying they've shrunk and advanced the PS1 and put thousands of them in the PS5, so we're really get PSx10^x?

>>56

Yes, math whiz. Haha pretty much.

>>57

Well, in that case, why can't we live in our games yet? If the systems are so advanced, why is that the realism, speed, and game size are the only things they're improving?