>>1383 Very crude example: turn on your TV and watch your fears play themselves, but every time you try to turn your TV off, you go blind, but not deaf, and the only way to regain your eyesight is to restart your fears on the TV and watch them all. Then off to the next horror...

>>1375 Okay, you're on to something. So it's kind of like a choose your own adventure thing, but every path you take leads to horror. In what ways would you CHOOSE your paths? Give us examples.

>>1370 No, I don't think it would be nice. Please read 1368 - my response to 1356.

>>1369 That sounds very familiar. Oh wait, yeah. We live in a world just like that.

>>1368 I like the alternate dimension Chris idea, but then why give him the same name in a different universe? If they really wanted to get away from the old, why didn't they just start fresh, with a clean slate?

>>1367 In that case, we're probably on the conservative/traditional wave right now, because everything is just returning to the olden days.

>>1366 So what you're saying is that everyone is destined to become sellouts and that we'll just have to hope for new things from elsewhere, and enjoy that before they sell out too.

>>1365 Sometimes, reading makes me tired, so arguing is better, but I can't argue without reading, because there would be nothing to argue about and I would lose, so I will not read, and just shut up.

>>1363 Playing the write or right is maybe wrong in the hack, but when does you jumping on foxes maybe writing is good.

>>1362 What if what you had to DO was continue to CHOOSE to be terrified, for as long as you can take it (or beyond). There would be no "dying" or "winning." Just endless horror for as long as you want it to last.

>>1361 I see your point about the perspective, but watching someone else experience an excellent game is still better than being immersed in a subpar game.

>>1360 I don't think it's possible. I'm still here typing away, so I'm proof that it keeps going like the Energizer bunny.

>>1359 Disney will buy everything and every character ever will have their own standalone movie, and in the end, will come together in a giant crossover that destroys all things that were ever good.

>>1364 When they released those guns, they will make it as a DLC content just to make money out of this game. Especially this game is only worth with the resistance on it but the overall story is actualy meh for me

>>1358 That's exactly what I meant haha. I mean, wouldn't it be nice to connect everything together?

>>1357 I like your sarcasm and I fully endorse your idea of new accessories. In the end, all they wanted to do was create a virus so they could have a monopoly on protective clothing and accessories.

>>1356 But back to 'Redfield.' I don't think it's Chris. I think it would be boring if it's Chris. He's got to be some kind of descendant. Maybe he's a distant relative, who has no awareness of Chris's existence. Maybe he's an alternate Chris Redfield from a separate RE universe (which started in 7). Who knows? I just don't think it's Chris. I don't think they would go through the trouble of leaving the old RE behind, just to come right back around and return to it.

>>1356 No, you're not the only one. I feel the same way too. But I don't think it's a new concept. People have always used what's trending to make profit. It just so happens that being liberal and progressive is trendy now. Things happen in waves. Being conservative and traditional will become trendy again, as soon as being liberal and progressive "gets old." Then the cycle goes on.

>>1355 Because it's risky. Being new can mean failure, and failure, in this case, could mean that some families don't eat, can't pay rent, or will have to find new jobs. Things aren't as simple as "Let's make original content for the sake of art."

>>1354 Well, I'm glad you didn't argue, because I'm also too tired to argue, but read everything again, and maybe you'll see what I see, and agree, and won't want to argue when you're too tired to argue.

I am hoping they released more new guns that can be added to the game! Especially that can be used on resistance that will be awesome

>>1353 Job so good you write using knife already did many things with dodge. Can does you do writing for the playing?

>>1352 So, what would we have to DO in the game, if we're not trying to survive? I mean, most (if not all) games have some kind of survival element to them. Even in Tetris, you can "die" if your Tetriminos reach the top. If it's pure horro, then wouldn't it just be some kind of "experimental" movie?

>>1351 Right, 7 was an improvement from 5 & 6, and if you've read the rumors about 8, it seems like they're going to continue from what worked in 7 and keep the FP perspective. I think it's a good move. It makes me feel like I'm the one experiencing the game, instead of watching someone experience it.

>>1350 RE has been missing something since 4. I wonder if it's possible to exhaust the imagination of a human being, because that seems to be what's happening here.

>>1349 That just made me imagine Nemesis yelling "I'm gonna wreck it!" at X, while pounding him. Ah, when Disney buys Capcom next.

>>1348 By 'make much more sense,' do you mean "make what I want to happen, happen?" That's what it sounds like to me. Wish fulfillment ain't a bad thing, I guess.

>>1345 Oh wowwwwwww. Are they going to create a whole rainbow of umbrellas just to keep the franchise going? When they get tired of changing the colors, maybe they'll change the accessory. Maybe they'll make raincoats and rain boots!

>>1355 By beloved, I mean someone by the last name of Redfield, since that's where they left off in 7. It doesn't seem like a mystery to me. It'll probably try to meet its non-sexist quota by having female playable characters, and its overall non-discriminatory quota by having colored people and possibly the rare LGBTQ+ character. I'm all for progress and inclusion, but am I the only one who finds it a tasteless when progressiveness is presented to make profit?

>>1341 One of the headlines said it's a mix of 4 & 7. Though it's better than a remake, if that rumor is true, then I can't really call it new. It would just be another continuation. It'll probably try to appeal to people's sense of nostalgia (again), by bringing back "beloved" characters. Sigh. Why is it so hard for people to be new?